Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Eelco Ubbels's avatar

The supercore inflation inflection is the most underappreciated element of this print, and the TAA consensus has not yet rotated to account for it.

Equities remain 61.5% overweight (ranked 1st, declining trend), while the 30-year yield breakout above 5% is exactly the scenario that historically compresses multiples fastest in high-and-rising inflation regimes.

Consumer Discretionary, where the purchasing power squeeze is most direct, sits 50.0% underweight in the TAA consensus (ranked 9th, declining trend), which is the correct response.

Consumer Staples at 42.9% underweight (ranked 10th, upward trend in underweight) is the harder paradox: if real wages are negative, staples should theoretically benefit from defensiveness, yet the consensus is moving against them.

UBP, Asset Allocation Award winner 2026, captured the structural risk clearly: "earnings expectations could face downward revisions in the coming months" as "higher energy and input costs could erode corporate margins, while weaker consumer purchasing power and softer business confidence may weigh on revenue growth."

The SAA lens adds a second layer: US equities carry a 10-year consensus return of just 6.13% annualised with the highest dispersion among developed markets (std dev 1.7), per Alpha Research Capital Market Assumptions, April 1, 2026, assetallocationreport.com. Low conviction on long-term return, mounting short-term multiple compression risk.

If supercore stays above 3% for a third consecutive month, does the equity overweight in the TAA consensus become harder to defend even for managers who are still constructive on AI earnings?

No posts

Ready for more?